A while ago, some people on The Left thought about Barak Obama, and what might the consquenses be if he were elected. Or even nominated. After all, the US has some history of political assassinations and attempts thereof (especially, but not exclusively, at progressives); and of white supremacists; and even of Just Plain Nutjobs Who Blow Shit Up For No Good Reason.
The howls of derision started up from the usual suspects that this was some sort of pathological deathwish fantasy... on the part of The Left. There was simply no evidence that anything was likely to happen: it was simply those lefty idiots hyperventilating over nothing, again. Those fools.
I mean, it's not like Obama is in any danger whatsoever, is it?
The howls of derision started up from the usual suspects that this was some sort of pathological deathwish fantasy... on the part of The Left. There was simply no evidence that anything was likely to happen: it was simply those lefty idiots hyperventilating over nothing, again. Those fools.
I mean, it's not like Obama is in any danger whatsoever, is it?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-26 06:05 am (UTC)I think that Obama must be conscious of the potential for there to be gun-sights focussed on him wherever he goes. And for that, I admire him more.
Where this perfectly rational fear is discussed, it is routinely derided as loony paranoia, which makes me doubt the intellectual honesty of those doing the deriding. Seriously. Blind Freddie knows the risk exists, and why. How can supposedly intelligent and informed individuals genuinely not see it?
I think the word the kids use these days is 'pwned'.
Date: 2008-08-26 07:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-27 07:05 am (UTC)Instead they seem to be running with the "bunch of meth-heads"/"not a credible threat" line.
Maybe they're saving the Clinton line for when there is a credible threat.