An interlude in Disney-land.
Mar. 5th, 2009 08:16 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I get home last night to discover that the girls are still watching Disney's Sleeping Beauty.
I've not seen it before myself, but it does look cute, especially in the remastered widescreen version.
When it finished,
mimdancer looked slightly disgusted and pointed out that Sleeping Beauty (she is given a name, but no-one remembers what it is) doesn't do anything. I pointed out that she is not the protagonist, she's the prize... her purpose is to be fought over, and given to the winner. This is, of course, not a new observation, but still, we wondered about the message soaking into our daughters' brains.
I shouldn't have worried. Miss S came up to me immediately afterwards and stood with her face inches from mine and said very solemnly, but with an underlying thrill of excitement, that “Daddy: I fought a dragon and I killed a dragon. In the park. Mummy took me to a park today and I killed a dragon.”
Fairy Tales don't teach girls to be passive and submissive, they get enough of that from prime-time TV.
And Fairy Tales don't teach children that monsters exist: this is already well understood.
Fairy Tales teach children that monsters can be fought, and monsters can be defeated.
The biggest problem that I can see is that they also teach children that you will always know a monster when you see one...
I've not seen it before myself, but it does look cute, especially in the remastered widescreen version.
When it finished,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I shouldn't have worried. Miss S came up to me immediately afterwards and stood with her face inches from mine and said very solemnly, but with an underlying thrill of excitement, that “Daddy: I fought a dragon and I killed a dragon. In the park. Mummy took me to a park today and I killed a dragon.”
Fairy Tales don't teach girls to be passive and submissive, they get enough of that from prime-time TV.
And Fairy Tales don't teach children that monsters exist: this is already well understood.
Fairy Tales teach children that monsters can be fought, and monsters can be defeated.
The biggest problem that I can see is that they also teach children that you will always know a monster when you see one...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-04 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-04 10:30 pm (UTC)Also: isn't it a bit depressing that the only role that's looked down upon in these old tales are nowadays the roles of the passive women?
There is nothing cool in being peaceful, only a sword (or some such) can be cool. We surely do give mixed signals about our world.
I don't believe that these classics are bad per se, but I do believe they send messages to kids on deeper levels than you'd think. Your girl identifies with the prince, as do many other (as did I), and in time she'll ask herself why she identifies with the character that isn't a girl, and other things will come from that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-04 11:12 pm (UTC)How do you mean ‘depressing’: are you sad that women are looked down upon for passivity, or that there are other roles which should be looked down upon as much or more?
I am not worried that my girls will be, or not be feminine enough. I would be more worried if they took the stereotypes presented at face value. I would far prefer that they do question things like this, and do so informedly. They aren't going to escape the influence, but they can be educated about it, and taught that they don't have to accept it wholesale.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-04 11:41 pm (UTC)Regardless of your girls (who seem to be doing just fine), I do worry, in general, about how women view other women and themselves.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-05 02:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-05 12:49 pm (UTC)Miss S. has obviously learned that lesson and long may she keep killing dragons, even when they look like windmills sometimes.