The entire world's opinion of the Palestinian role in the ‘Peace Process’ are based on lies

[catsidhe]

As we know from reading America's fine newspapers, Ehud Barak made Yasser Arafat an incredibly "generous offer" at Camp David in 2000. Arafat turned it down because he had always been negotiating in bad faith. Then Arafat launched the second intifada to try to destroy Israel. At this point Israel had no choice but to defend itself, as it had no partner for peace. And so on until today.

Or...that's all complete bullshit

Comments

[tcpip.livejournal.com]

Posted by moi about 12 months ago in another forum

With regards to Barak's Camp David talks in 2000, the actual content has been secret for a long time. However late last year a dossier of the negotions were published in Haaretz. The disconnected state of Palestine would be less than 20% of their historic homeland and would lose virtually the entire Jordan Valley, the only seriously fertile area in the region. Huge sections of Jerusalem would be annexed to Israel. Israel would have continued with 400,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank, with linked security roads turning the Palestinian towns into isolated enclaves.

Under this 'offer' it is hardly surprising that Arafat rejected the proposal.

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/printer9181.shtml

Now I'll read your link...

.... and, sadly, that doesn't surprise in the least.