Someone wrote in [personal profile] catsidhe 2007-10-25 04:08 am (UTC)

$$$

If money is the meaningful measure (looking at that link there), we have been robbed by big business!!

The wages share of GDP has moved from 53.9% to 53.8%

This is supposed to be a good thing??

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/7d12b0f6763c78caca257061001cc588/6d78e92a3f2bc51aca25727200796236!OpenDocument

Australia's 2005/6 GDP was $921,747m. Therefore 0.1% was $921m. So let's crunch some numbers here ... how many people were earning above the minimum wage?

Minimum wage was $511.86 per week in 2005 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage#Australia

An approximate number of people earning at least this was 16 million people.

http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/ABSNavigation/prenav/ViewData?action=404&documentproductno=0&documenttype=Details&order=1&tabname=Details&areacode=0&issue=2006&producttype=Census%20Tables&javascript=true&textversion=false&navmapdisplayed=true&breadcrumb=POTLD&&collection=Census&period=2006&productlabel=Gross%20Individual%20Income%20(weekly)%20by%20Age%20by%20Sex%20&producttype=Census%20Tables&method=Location%20on%20Census%20Night&topic=Earnings&

So, if we assume that people earning above the minimum wage are the main contributors to realising GDP (yeah, ok, but what other number can I use??), I should be earning $57 more per week? An extra $3,000 per year could buy me a pretty cool new bicycle every year!!

-- mpp

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org